Press Release – September 15, 2014

The Advocates for Jehovah’s Witness Reform on Blood ( AKA Associated Jehovah’s Witnesses for Reform on Blood) welcome the stand taken by, and fully support Brett and Naghmeh King’s decision to allow blood transfusions for their son Ashya, should they be needed.

We acknowledge that these are dissident views not supported by the Watchtower Society, or Jehovah’s Witnesses as an organization. Taking such a position could lead to a judicial committee investigation on the charge of apostasy and result in their being disfellowshipped with the subsequent extreme shunning Jehovah’s Witnesses are well-known for practicing. Nonetheless, these parents clearly are prepared to put the needs of their child first despite the theological ramifications.

may26-94-awOther Jehovah’s Witness children have not been as fortunate. The cover of the May 22, 1994 Awake! Magazine features photos of 26 children with the caption, “Youths Who Put God First.” Inside the Watchtower publication proclaims: “In former times thousands of youths died for putting God first. They are still doing it, only today the drama is played out in hospitals and courtrooms, with blood transfusions the issue.”

Adherence to the blood doctrine has likely cost thousands of Jehovah’s Witnesses their lives in medical situations where non-blood alternatives are either insufficient or simply do not exist.

Thankfully, as this case illustrates, the tide has turned among those called upon to support the policy with the lives of their children.

The 2014 Global Survey of Jehovah’s Witnesses shows shrinking support for this policy with only 19.42% of parents prepared to allow their child to die rather than have a blood transfusions as shown below.1

AJWRB has been informing and educating Jehovah’s Witnesses concerning the irrational aspects of the Watchtower Society’s blood policy since 1997. Though once a voice for a dissident minority, it seems there is now a growing number of Jehovah’s Witness parents who oppose this complex and controversial policy.

While details of this story are difficult to verify from press reports alone, it is noteworthy that the parents have publicly said that they will allow their child blood transfusions if medically necessary. This is despite the information disseminated by the Jehovah’s Witness leadership, who systematically demonize any use of blood that does not conform to their strange and evolving policy. The parents actions are also remarkable from the standpoint that Jehovah’s Witnesses have made it abundantly clear they will not tolerate dissent on this issue as shown in the experiences below.

The Rado Vleugel Story

Gestapo Tactics – The Wayne Rogers Story

Control and Repression – The Ray Hemming Story

Primer/overview of the issues: Do Jehovah’s Witnesses Really Abstain from Blood?
For further information please visit our website at: www.ajwrb.org

Contact Information
Telephone: 616-430-6027

1-Survey results courtesy of www.jwsurvey.org

This press release is available as a PDF.


Comments

Press Release – September 15, 2014 — 2 Comments

  1. The hypocricy of this doctrine can be read in a recent Watchtower’s article:

    Many medical professionals and other advocates of blood transfusion appeal to people to donate blood in hopes of saving lives. However, Jehovah’s holy people acknowledge that the Creator has the right to say how blood is to be treated. To him, “any sort of blood” is sacred. We must be determined to obey his law on blood. By our holy conduct, we prove to him that we deeply appreciate the lifesaving power of Jesus’ blood —the only blood that makes possible the forgiveness of sin and everlasting life.—John 3:16. (The Watchtower November 2014, Study Edition, article: “Why We Must Be Holy”, paragraph 15)

    If any sort of blood is sacred to Jehovah why do the Witnesses accept erythropoietin (EPO), which contains albumin extracted from the blood of many “worldly” donors?
    On the other hand the blood ban of the Watchtower Society has nothing to do with “holiness”. Listen to Jesus:

    What goes into someone’s mouth does not defile them, but what comes out of their mouth, that is what defiles them.(Matthew 15:11)

    So, if a person receives a blood transfusion it does not affect his (or her) spirituality .

  2. I spent many sleepless nights over this issue.

    Then, I woke up one morning with a settled mind. It is all about GIVING AND TAKING.

    If someone shares an Organ willingly, including the liquid Organ of Blood….they are GIVING. Jesus GAVE his blood and flesh WILLINGLY for us. Even the Disciples were horrified at the thought of partaking in his “symbolic” blood and flesh.

    However, when life is TAKEN, and the victim is unwilling… this is Returned to Jehovah.

    It is all about Medical Ethics… a Solomon type situation in effect.

    Two kidneys are offered to You or your desperate child. One is GIVEN by a willing compatible DONOR.

    The other has been HARVESTED under duress from an unwilling victim.

    What decision would you take?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *